SERVICES

Health & organizational advisory
Clearer health communication.

Strengthen the funding, reporting, and administrative workflows around care. Help program teams translate operational needs into resources, agreements, and IT requirements.

For hospital operations teams, community clinics, health nonprofits, and health technology organizations.

A GOOD FIT

For the work
in front of you.

  • A health program seeking funding or organizing award requirements.
  • Administrative referral and reporting workflows that need clearer ownership.
  • Teams coordinating program requirements with enterprise IT.

WHEN ANOTHER ROUTE IS NEEDED

Define the boundary early.

  • Direct patient care, clinical triage, or individualized medical advice.
  • Patient-record processing through this website or the current advisory offer.
  • Clinical validation or institutional endorsement inferred from a collaborator’s employment.

THE WORK, IN DETAIL

What your team
can put to work.

Combine the workstreams your team needs, with clear owners and review points.

7 workstreams 63 deliverables

01Health-program funding and administration9 deliverablesConnect health-program design to resources and reporting.

Program and funding-fit review, Government and foundation proposal narratives, Health-program budget and cost justification, and six more.

  • Program and funding-fit review
  • Government and foundation proposal narratives
  • Health-program budget and cost justification
  • Public-health award reporting calendar
  • Grant-funded position descriptions and cost-allocation documentation
  • Funder correspondence and amendment drafts
  • Board and leadership reporting packages
  • Award deliverable and evidence register
  • Renewal and continuation planning brief
02Care-adjacent operations and workflow9 deliverablesDocument the administrative work around a handoff without entering patient care.

Nonclinical referral-process map, Epic workflow and automation requirements document, Program-to-IT change-request specification, and six more.

  • Nonclinical referral-process map
  • Epic workflow and automation requirements document
  • Program-to-IT change-request specification
  • Nonclinical intake, routing, and escalation documentation
  • Access, scheduling, and follow-up process map using non-patient information
  • Operational handoff and responsibility matrix
  • Non-patient data and reporting requirements
  • Staff training resources and operational handover notes
  • Workflow improvement backlog with owners and acceptance criteria
03Community health partnerships9 deliverablesGive health and community partners a shared operating agreement.

Community health partner and service-resource map, Community health worker program structure and administrative role definitions, Hospital-community MOU and scope drafts for authorized review, and six more.

  • Community health partner and service-resource map
  • Community health worker program structure and administrative role definitions
  • Hospital-community MOU and scope drafts for authorized review
  • Partner onboarding packet and escalation routes
  • Shared program metrics and reporting-responsibility map
  • Community health needs assessment public-data and engagement summary
  • Implementation-strategy documentation for leadership approval
  • Partnership meeting packet and action register
  • Partner capacity and funding-continuity brief
04Health content and health literacy9 deliverablesMake general health information clearer for its intended audience.

General health-content inventory and audience brief, Plain-language editorial review with a stated readability target, Patient and caregiver material drafts for clinical approval, and six more.

  • General health-content inventory and audience brief
  • Plain-language editorial review with a stated readability target
  • Patient and caregiver material drafts for clinical approval
  • Health-literacy review findings and revision recommendations
  • Translation and cultural-adaptation coordination brief
  • Terminology and consistency guide
  • Accessibility review checklist for content formats
  • Source, review-date, and clinical-approval register
  • Content revision log and unresolved-question list
05Digital health product content9 deliverablesGive users a clear path through general information and help content.

Digital health knowledge-base structure, Help-content information architecture, Product onboarding content review, and six more.

  • Digital health knowledge-base structure
  • Help-content information architecture
  • Product onboarding content review
  • Nonclinical interface labels and error-message library
  • FAQ and general resource-directory content
  • Editorial workflow with clinical approval checkpoints
  • Content acceptance criteria and release checklist
  • Outdated-content register and review schedule
  • Content usability findings based on approved, non-patient research
06Program evaluation and reporting9 deliverablesGive teams a reliable view of program delivery and reporting obligations.

Program evaluation plan with outcome definitions, Non-patient and aggregate data-source inventory, Data dictionary and reporting-frequency schedule, and six more.

  • Program evaluation plan with outcome definitions
  • Non-patient and aggregate data-source inventory
  • Data dictionary and reporting-frequency schedule
  • Program and funder dashboard specification
  • Data-quality checks and exception register
  • Program progress report with evidence notes
  • Partner feedback instrument and synthesis framework
  • Learning-review memo with data and interpretation limits
  • Reporting handover guide and archive index
07Planned nursing collaboration9 deliverablesA separate advisory workstream, confirmed before engagement.

Plain-language review of general health content, Review of staff education materials, Nonclinical workflow observations, and six more.

  • Plain-language review of general health content
  • Review of staff education materials
  • Nonclinical workflow observations
  • Care-coordination resource review
  • Questions and ambiguity logs for your clinical reviewers
  • Editorial recommendations informed by bedside and nurse-line experience
  • General caregiver-content review with clinical approval questions
  • Nursing-informed terminology and usability review notes
  • Content review summary with scope, limitations, and recommended follow-up

A DEFINED START. AN ONGOING RHYTHM.

How the work unfolds.

Timing and output volume are agreed after reviewing your records, access, and available capacity.

SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS

Experience behind the work.

Health equity01

$2.5M

Stronger support for families

Read the work

Secured multi-year family-resource-center funding. Connected community needs, program design, proposal narratives, and budgets.

Roots Community Health · First 5 Santa Clara

Explore Health & organizational advisory →
Health workforce06

$1M

Pathways into healthier communities

Read the work

Developed successful funding work supporting health-equity and workforce pathways, alongside a broader foundation and public-sector portfolio.

Roots Community Health · Gilead HEAL/GATHER

Explore Health & organizational advisory →
See the broader record →
What you keep

WHAT YOU KEEP

The work leaves
something behind.

  1. 01

    A funding and reporting plan

  2. 02

    A documented administrative workflow

  3. 03

    Partner materials ready for review

  4. 04

    A prioritized change and decision log

Exhibit 07 · Health & organizational advisory workflow

  1. Question
  2. Evidence
  3. Draft
  4. Review
  5. Resource
Source: Praxis delivery model. Illustrative sequence: Question → Evidence → Draft → Review → Resource.

WORKING INSIDE COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Program needs.
Enterprise realities.

Hisham has developed Epic workflow and automation requirements within a large county IT environment, coordinating program needs with technical teams. The work connects referral logic, data fields, routing, reporting, and operational handoffs.

Experience also includes an online learning platform, program trackers, and Visio process mapping. The contribution: translating the real work into requirements people can build, test, and use.

PLANNED NURSING COLLABORATION

A practiced eye.
A human perspective.

Nancy Iriarte-Ali Bob, MSN, RN, PHN brings five years of pediatric medical-surgical bedside experience and current clinical nurse-line work. A UCSF Clinical Nurse II and master’s-prepared Clinical Nurse Leader, her background spans 17 pediatric subspecialties, family education, safety coaching, and Epic/APEX.

The planned RN contribution is content review and organizational advice, subject to engagement confirmation. No patient care, triage, individual medical advice, or patient-record access. Clients retain clinical oversight and final approval. Nancy’s UCSF employment is separate from PSG.

Capacity and pricing
YOUR FIRST STEP

A funding and reporting plan

HOW IT RUNS

A diagnostic, one priority deliverable, then an agreed monthly rhythm.

HOW IT IS PRICED

Quoted for your scope, capacity, and review requirements.

SCOPE & RESPONSIBILITY

Clear boundaries.
Stronger collaboration.

Current services are non-patient-facing. Planned nursing-informed review by Nancy Iriarte-Ali Bob requires a separately agreed scope and availability. No direct care, triage, patient-specific advice, or patient-record access is offered. Your clinical and compliance leaders retain approval; no UCSF affiliation or endorsement of Praxis is implied.

CAPACITY, AGREED

A scope for now.
A rhythm for what follows.

01

Advisory

Your team can execute; you need a senior thought partner and review.

  • Scheduled strategy and decision reviews
  • Feedback on priority drafts and budgets
  • An updated action and risk list

First monthDiagnostic, one reviewed priority deliverable, and a 90-day plan.

02

Delivery

You need a defined workstream carried from draft to completion.

  • An agreed monthly deliverable queue
  • Drafting, building, or reporting capacity
  • A regular review and handoff meeting

First monthDiagnostic, one completed priority deliverable, and a sequenced backlog.

03

Embedded

Several connected responsibilities need ongoing coordination.

  • Reserved fractional capacity across agreed workstreams
  • Coordination with staff and external reviewers
  • A shared calendar, reporting rhythm, and roadmap

First monthAn operating map, one urgent deliverable, and the first 90 days of coordinated work.

Fees are quoted against the scope, capacity, and review requirements. We do not work on commission or contingency. Software subscriptions, specialist services, and travel are identified separately before you commit.

For public agencies and procurement teams

Praxis Strategy Group Inc. can provide a W-9 and $1 million general liability insurance information for vendor review. We agree required registrations, endorsements, and contract terms before accepting an award. Procurement, sole-source eligibility, and subcontracting follow your agency’s rules.

Praxis does not currently have an active SAM.gov registration. Any required entity ID or registration is resolved for the specific opportunity before award.

Questions we are usually asked

BEFORE WE BEGIN

Questions you
may be weighing.

Are you a clinical vendor?

The current offer is administrative and advisory. It covers funding, reporting, agreements, workflow requirements, and organizational resources. It does not include treating patients, clinical triage, or individualized medical advice.

Can you review patient-facing content?

General health information can be considered for a separately scoped, nursing-informed editorial review. Your clinical reviewers approve all clinical accuracy and use. Do not include patient-specific information in an inquiry.

Do you work with our compliance office?

Yes. Your organization defines privacy, access, procurement, and review requirements. We document them before work begins and use your approved channels and resources.

Can you help with Epic workflows?

Hisham has developed workflow and automation requirements within a large county IT environment. This means translating program needs into fields, routing, reporting, and acceptance criteria for your authorized technical teams.

What does Nancy’s experience add?

Nancy brings five years of bedside nursing, including pediatric med-surg, and current clinical nurse-line experience. Planned collaboration focuses on general content, staff resources, and organizational advice, subject to an agreed engagement.

Can you support a grant-funded health program remotely?

Yes. Proposal development, award reporting, partnership materials, and administrative workflow coordination can be delivered remotely through an agreed calendar and client-controlled review process.

THE NEXT STEP

Clearer resources for the teams behind care.